Archive for June 26th, 2007

the war on idiocy
The pathology of conservatism

Ever wonder why conservatives act the way they do? Turns out they may all be suffering from a well-documented psychological phenomenon that makes them think they’re super smart, while they are, in fact, idiots.

An unrelated post on Kottke.org drew my attention to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, or the tendency for individuals with little knowledge to systematically think that they know more than others who have much more knowledge. Individuals experiencing the Dunning-Kruger Effect consistently fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy, and vastly overestimate their skills. Or, in the slightly more poetic phrasing of Charles Darwin, “ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”

The Dunning-Kruger Effect would explain Rove, Cheney and Bush’s single-minded determination to invade Iraq, despite reams of contradictory evidence. They were convinced of their genius status, and knew way more than all those intelligence analysts and academics. Unfortunately, whilst in the thrall Dunning-Kruger, they failed to recognize that they were actually morons.

Here are some other things potentially explained by the Dunning-Kruger Effect:

  • Stephen Harper’s climate change plan;
  • The Bush Administration’s denial that global warming even exists;
  • ‘New’ Coke;
  • The last federal Liberal election campaign;
  • Anything Bill O’Reilly has ever said; and
  • Ezra Levant’s entire life so far.

Better living through psychology. This is what makes many conservatives so dangerous- the profound confidence they have all the answers, without any intelligence, insight or actual solutions to back it up.

June 26th, 2007 by graeme | | 10 comments »

green bin
Finally, a hole in the taiga

Ah, the Tunguska Event. In 1908, it levelled trees, vaporized wildlife and lit up the skys over Siberia. It has also baffled scientists, since the explosion was thought to have dug no crater.

Until now.

A group of Italian scientists have found a lake occupying a small, bowl-shaped depression near the epicentre of the blast. Lake Cheko was likely created when a small fragment of the original meteor struck the ground. The majority of the meteor was destroyed by the airburst explosion that knocked down trees and terrified eyewitnesses- a blast equivalent to 20 million tonnes of TNT.

The theory is controversial. Dr Gareth Collins, a research associate at Imperial College London, UK, said:

“The impact cratering community does not accept structures as craters unless there is evidence of high temperatures and high pressures. That requires evidence of rocks that have been melted or rocks that have been ground up by the impact.”

According to Collins, the crater is too shallow and lacks the tell-tale ‘flap’ of debris around the rim. It’s also elliptical, which is strange.

More to the point: where is the ‘impact cratering community’, and how do I join?

Tree vs. Meteor. Advantage: meteor.

June 26th, 2007 by graeme | | 2 comments »

Politics. Media. Culture.
Now you know.

search


about

categories


recent posts









archives

read these

Progressive Bloggers Add to Technorati Favorites Nunc Scio RSS Feed Graeme's BlogTO Articles RSS Feed Join Society Blog Directory
Best Non-Partisan Blog! Best Non-Partisan Blog! Nunc Scio at Blogged