<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadians in Spaaaaace&#8230;!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/</link>
	<description>Politics. Media. Culture. Now you know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:34:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: graeme</title>
		<link>http://www.nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/comment-page-1/#comment-6478</link>
		<dc:creator>graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/#comment-6478</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to confess that I was being a smart-ass here, LKO. I am also a big fan of space exploration, although less so when the skies become cluttered with rich idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to confess that I was being a smart-ass here, LKO. I am also a big fan of space exploration, although less so when the skies become cluttered with rich idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener's Own</title>
		<link>http://www.nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/comment-page-1/#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener's Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/#comment-6475</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d call this &quot;totally useless&quot; (although I should point out that I&#039;m a HUGE fan of space exploration, so I&#039;m biased!).  After all, even if you&#039;re just sending rich tourists into space, sending ANYTHING safely in to space and back again is still a pretty risky business and impressive technical endeavour.  I&#039;m sure the engineers on the project will learn TONNES that will benefit non-extravangently wealthy citizens too, in the long run.

Personally, I&#039;m all for the (well-regulated and reasonably safe) private exploitation of space (for tourism anyway... I&#039;ll wait until we start mining operations to get worried...).  Anything that pushes us further into space (and lets face it, NASA and the CSA don&#039;t have the influence to push anymore) is a good thing, imho.

Plus, the article doesn&#039;t say that the pad will ONLY be used for tourism.  It will also be used for missions to the ISS, and probably (hopefully) other future space stations as well.  Personally, I&#039;d love to see the next generation of manned vehicles (post-shuttle) taking off to repair the space station, or rotate in a crew from a ground station in Nova Scotia.  I&#039;d also like to think that such a station might spur us on to actually putting a Canadian in space ourselves.  Only three countries have put people in space (the U.S., Russia, and China) and I&#039;d love to see Canada be the fourth (before the ESA puts someone up).

Anyway, as I said I&#039;m a big proponent of space exploration, so you&#039;ll rarely see me objecting to any money for space-related exploration.  Still, I think objectively that this is a good thing for Canada.  There are worse things we could spend Lockheed martin&#039;s money on, imho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d call this &#8220;totally useless&#8221; (although I should point out that I&#8217;m a HUGE fan of space exploration, so I&#8217;m biased!).  After all, even if you&#8217;re just sending rich tourists into space, sending ANYTHING safely in to space and back again is still a pretty risky business and impressive technical endeavour.  I&#8217;m sure the engineers on the project will learn TONNES that will benefit non-extravangently wealthy citizens too, in the long run.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m all for the (well-regulated and reasonably safe) private exploitation of space (for tourism anyway&#8230; I&#8217;ll wait until we start mining operations to get worried&#8230;).  Anything that pushes us further into space (and lets face it, NASA and the CSA don&#8217;t have the influence to push anymore) is a good thing, imho.</p>
<p>Plus, the article doesn&#8217;t say that the pad will ONLY be used for tourism.  It will also be used for missions to the ISS, and probably (hopefully) other future space stations as well.  Personally, I&#8217;d love to see the next generation of manned vehicles (post-shuttle) taking off to repair the space station, or rotate in a crew from a ground station in Nova Scotia.  I&#8217;d also like to think that such a station might spur us on to actually putting a Canadian in space ourselves.  Only three countries have put people in space (the U.S., Russia, and China) and I&#8217;d love to see Canada be the fourth (before the ESA puts someone up).</p>
<p>Anyway, as I said I&#8217;m a big proponent of space exploration, so you&#8217;ll rarely see me objecting to any money for space-related exploration.  Still, I think objectively that this is a good thing for Canada.  There are worse things we could spend Lockheed martin&#8217;s money on, imho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/comment-page-1/#comment-6472</link>
		<dc:creator>The Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuncscio.com/2007/10/26/canadians-in-spaaaaace/#comment-6472</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a Canada Arm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a Canada Arm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

