First: for the love of God, don’t panic. It has been three and a half days and people have gone bonkers. When the streets run thick with garbage and we bow before the gilded throne of a new Rat King, by all means go bat-shazbot insane. But in the meantime, perhaps we should just suck it up. After all, it could be worse. You could’ve had this guy‘s week.
There are lots of other things you can do to mitigate the effects of what promises to be a long and highly irritating strike. Reduce the amount of garbage you produce. Organize neighbourhood trash trips to the nearest transfer station, complete with themed snacks (Mmm. Barbecue flavoured detritus mix!) and obnoxious road games. Pay an exhorbitant fee to grey market profiteers to haul your stinkables away. Or, dedicate a week’s worth of writing on your slightly popular blog to the vagaries of trash removal in this fine city.
But, as a wise man once said, “leave no crisis unused.” Perhaps the best way to survive this crisis is to clear a small patch of open ground of banana peels and coffee grounds and used tissues, and consider what has led us to this unfortunate juncture. In a rare insightful and clear-headed column, Christie Blatchford provides some helpful advice: “you have to know who to be mad at.”
In no particular order, then:
- The Mayor. Look, there’s no questions David Miller is a good guy. But with every passing day, you’ve got to wonder if he’s a good mayor. The man has been in power since 2003, and for someone who campaigned with the timeless “a new broom sweeps clean” imagery, precious little has changed. The city is still broke. The waterfront remains undeveloped. The bike plan languishes. And Miller has been singularly ineffective in lobbying for a “new deal” for Toronto. The city is still abused and neglected by the Federal government, and when Miller tries to pressure Ottawa into coughing up some cash – as he did with the $1.2 billion streetcar deal – the results are often catastrophic. And people are getting fed up with Miller’s bent political calculus. An Ipsos-Reid poll released today shows a veritable collapse in the Mayor’s support. True, the survey was commissioned by The National Post for glaringly obvious political reasons, and the article announcing is almost embarassingly partisan. But the numbers are still there.
- City Council. If ever there was a case study in how self-interest and narrow-thinking can corrupt the public service motivation, it’s Toronto’s City Council. Kissinger once said that student politics was so savage precisely because the stakes were so small. Our 44 councillors somehow manage to retain the petulance of a student union despite being the administrative body of city of 4.5 million. These folks play a penny-ante game, despite the fact they’re in charge of frontline services for North Americ’s fifth largest metropolis. High stakes, indeed.
- 19th Century Political Structures. It has often been said that municipalities in Canada “are children of the provinces.” That kind of folksy epithet made a lot of sense in 1867, when even the largest cities were relatively small in size and regional in reach. But today, Toronto is a global behemoth, with cultural and economic links that stretch around the world. Toronto is not the child of Ontario. Toronto is a hulking longshoreman that carries Ontario – and Canada, to some extent – on its back. And yet, we’re forced to labour under a political financial arrangement that is woefully out-of-date. Why are we perpetually broke? Because Queen’s Park and Ottawa pillage the proceeds of our economy to feed less dynamic regions, and give us too little back. The modern iterations of cities like Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal and Calgary are unprecedented in the history of Canada, and require unprecedented revenue and political control to be successful. We desperately need a new kind of political status for our super-cities, something that allows us to maintain a high level of municipal services and infrastructure while simultaneously investing in our social, cultural and economic vitality.
- A Distinct Lack of Imagination. To some extent, these problems – a mediocre mayor, an inept council, and a raw political deal – are our own fault. We don’t demand better, so we’re forced to settle for less. This city is chockablock with innovators. So why does so little of that innovation find its way into our municipal government? A city – even a large city – is an ideal place for piloting “open governance”, “e-governance”, and other forms of technology-driven direct democracy. Where are the innovative public-private partnerships? The out-of-the-box public works projects? Toronto can be a truly world-class leader in commerce and creativity. But we’ve got to work for it, and not leave this project in the hands of ineffectual leaders.
Anyways, that’s what I’ve been thinking about in the first days of the Strike. I find the excitement of possibilities a worthy distraction from slow-building piles of trash.
What have you been thinking about?
Photo by KateDW.


I basically agree with this, but I think it’s worth pointing out that the mayor of Toronto really doesn’t have a lot of power compared to any other city councillor. Yeah, Miller hasn’t been able to follow through on a lot of things, but at least part of that is because of the structure of city government.
I blame the Mayor. And that’s it. Period.
Millar is not a “good guy” and on top of that he’s a TERRIBLE Mayor.
His constant whining to the Federal Government is embaressing and lazy.
Toronto is not neglected, it’s run by a group of easy-going layabouts who don’t want to work for anything. They want it handed to them.
Don’t even get me started on the lobbying for the new transit system. Toronto wasn’t even ELIGABLE for that.
As for the strike. Millar needs to grow a pair and start behavior like a leader. Make some decisions and stick to them!
*Before anyone suggests it – I have already written to the Mayor and my Council Member voicing my opinion.
David Millar is indeed a terrible mayor, mostly because he’s actually a professional cyclist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Millar
On the other hand, I maintain that David Miller is merely a mediocre mayor.
Couldn’t agree more. We also have a problem of far-reaching unions and a political divide between the two parties involved. I think the ineptitude shown by the city council in maintaining a 3% pay increase while fully knowing that this city is broke and labour negotiations are up-coming, shows a disconnect with how any rational person would define ‘public’ service.
That raw political deal you talk about has stuck in my craw for some time. The whole idea of sucking money out of a region into some administrative centre (Ottawa, Queen’s Park), and then grudgingly doling it back out again to where it really belongs strikes me as exceedingly nuts. I’m not sure it even made sense in the 19th Century, but it surely doesn’t make sense now.
It’s ripe for all kinds of abuse, too, though for those who want to keep it as the status quo that might well be a feature, not a bug.
Rather than money flowing into the centre(s) and back out again, I’d rather see it flow only one way. Municipalities collect all taxes, keep what they need to fulfill their own obligations, and pass the surplus up to the provinces. The provinces keep what they need to fulfill *their* obligations, and pass the surplus up to the Feds.
Too simple? Too complex? (How do you determine “obligations” at each level? What about municipalities that don’t run a surplus? Why would an MP or MPP vote for this?)
Okay, give each level its own hefty tax base. (Yes, munis have property tax all to themselves, but we know that’s inadequate.) So… what about a division something like this: municipalities get income tax and property tax. Provinces get energy taxes. The Feds get sales tax (only let’s call it a transaction tax, and cover more stuff at a lower rake-off), transportation taxes and telecommunication taxes. Nobody gets to poach on anybody else’s tax base. (The details of which level gets which tax base aren’t important; what matters is that each level gets a tax base that allows it to meet its obligations to the citizens under its jurisdiction.)
Ah well. It’s a pleasant fantasy, isn’t it? Now back to the real world, where sanity is a remittance man.