What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.